Suggest edit — startup-workflow

Title

Name

Note

---
visibility: public-edit
---

# startup workflow

the operational patterns from a neurotech startup i interned at. a "perpetual state of hackathon."

## weekly cadence

### tuesday morning — takeoff
sync on state. everyone gets aligned on what's happening, what needs to happen. this is [[resyncing]] made structural.

### monday night — re-entry
the most structured ritual. format:
1. conclude work at 6:30pm
2. 30 minutes solo reflection with pen and paper
3. group report: context → what you set out to do → how you performed → what each member could've done better

the solo reflection before group reporting is key — you need to process your own week before you can communicate it. slides required. always have a growth number.

## the growth number

"if we didn't have any of the position we gained this week, how much faster could we have gained it with all the skills we learned?"

this measures learning velocity, not output. a week where you shipped nothing but learned a lot still gets a high growth number. this connects to [[impostor-syndrome]] — "acceleration is much better than position."

## subteams

- **science** — research, testing
- **engineering** — products
- **growth** — people development, habits, zoom outs (see [[zooming-out]])

the fact that "growth" is a dedicated subteam, not an afterthought, says a lot about this startup's culture.

## 80-15-5 rule

- 80% mission-focused work
- 15% slightly tangential exploration
- 5% something completely whacky

this prevents the monotony that kills creativity and [[intentionality]]. it also means the [[critical-path]] question doesn't strangle serendipity.

## speed of decision-making

"anything under $500 don't ask me." this removes friction and empowers people. the cost of slow decisions often exceeds the cost of wrong ones at this scale.

## energy philosophy

"expending more energy frequently works." evolution optimized us to save energy — there's no reason to conserve it anymore. this is counterintuitive but matches my experience: the times i've pushed harder than felt natural, i've gotten more than proportionally more out.

## knowledge stacking

the CEO envied friends who just knew more. started aggressively learning via LLMs. "knowledge is super useful" — not a groundbreaking insight on its own, but the action (aggressive learning) is what matters.

## being forceful

"in pursuit of open-mindedness, was too passive in arguments." fix: be forceful in exchanging ideas, trust the other party not to collapse. this connects to [[feedback-and-honesty]] — honest friction is productive.