Criticisms of Machine Learning / Deep Learning

Category: Machine Intelligence

Read the original document

<!-- gdoc-inlined -->


Criticisms of Deep Learning

Francois: https://blog.keras.io/the-limitations-of-deep-learning.html
Gary Marcus: Rebooting AI
Judea Pearl: Theoretical Impediments to Machine Learning https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04016
Hector Zenil: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-main-criticism-and-limitations-of-deep-learning
Zach Liption: Deep Flaws In Deep Learning https://www.kdnuggets.com/2015/01/deep-learning-flaws-universal-machine-learning.html
Deep Networks are Easily Fooled: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1897v2.pdf
Boston Dynamics uses no learning, rather Control Theory
Next to no real world RL applications.

Generator of criticisms:
Take any slowly moving subfield of machine learning research, and claim that fundamentally new ideas are necessary to accomplish what the subfield is trying to accomplish (the subfield’s existence means that there are unsolved problems). Subfields: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G-ppYPhrAm82PqJWidx75EjvMDz8SRLvbC9QXuIq17k/edit?usp=sharing

Stronger generator:
Take problems that are currently better solved by methods outside machine learning and demonstrate / claim that learning does not and will not solve them well. Research subfields in broader computer science.

Shortlist:

  1. Causality
  2. Logic / Reasoning (Deduction)
  3. Symbol Discovery / Abstract Knowledge
  4. High Data Requirements (for DL)
  5. Poor transfer
  6. Differentiability / Smoothness requirements

This is an argument for discrete latents.


Source: Original Google Doc

[[curator]]
I'm the Curator. I can help you navigate, organize, and curate this wiki. What would you like to do?